YOUR VOICE MATTERS!

You can submit written testimony to the legislative committee considering a particular bill by email, or you can sign up to testify directly to the committee via Zoom at a public hearing.  This video will explain how to sign up.  You can access info on key bills from our Watchlist or go directly to the State CGA website for the weekly schedule of the legislature.  

2022 Legislative Session Testimony

Additional Background
SB 4: AAC The CT Clean Air Act

2021 Legislative Session Testimony 

GAS EXPANSION PLAN

Submitted 12-03-2021
Re: Comments on the 2022-24 Conservation and Load Management Plan
​Thank you for the opportunity to provide written comments regarding the 2022-2024 Conservation and Load Management (C & LM) Plan. The undersigned organizations urge DEEP to end incentives for gas equipment in the C & LM Plan. This request applies to all aspects of the C & LM Plan including residential, commercial, new construction, and retail programs. In light of the increasingly urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible, and DEEP’s own conclusion that Connecticut is not on track to meet its 2030 or 2050 emissions reduction targets required under the Global Warming Solutions Act, continuing gas incentives in the C & LM Plan is counterproductive and insupportable. 

Two hundred and thirty-two individuals and organizations submitted public comments to the Energy Efficiency Board (EEB), with 95% of those requesting in some way that incentives for gas equipment such as gas hot water heaters, boilers, and furnaces be eliminated in the final plan. These comments are available in the public record. Despite these requests for the removal of gas incentives, the utility companies and the EEB did not address this request in their official response to comments. The C & LM Plan does nothing to end incentives for gas in any programs, nor does it plan a phase down of gas subsidies. 

Nineteen organizations also made this request directly to Commissioner Dykes in a letter dated August 27, 2021 and sent by email. As noted in the letter, the Commissioner of DEEP has the final authority under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 16-245m(d)(1) to approve, modify, or reject the draft C & LM Plan, and we urge the Commissioner to remove all gas incentives from the 2022-2024 C & LM Plan.

The rising price of fossil gas also makes this an important moment to end gas incentives. The transition from gas to clean energy in homes can lock in more affordable and stable energy bills, along with climate and health benefits. Notably, Massachusetts just made significant changes to their three-year energy efficiency plan in response to criticism that the draft plan was inadequate to meet the state’s decarbonization targets. The updated plan includes increased measures to electrify the buildings sector, allocating $800 million towards residential electrification. It also calls for the installation of 54,000 residential heat pumps, including 6,650 income-eligible projects, and 34.1 million square feet in the commercial and industrial (C&I) sector, and commits to all-electric new construction in the residential and C&I sectors.
The Maryland Commission on Climate Change recently published a Buildings Energy Transition Plan to achieve net-zero emissions from the building sector by 2045 that, among other items, will sunset financial subsidies for fossil fuel appliances within EmPOWER (the state energy efficiency program), and will encourage fuel-switching and beneficial electrification through EmPOWER beginning in 2024. The plan also aims for 50 percent of residential heating systems, cooling systems, and water heater sales to be heat pumps by 2025, and 95 percent by 2030.
The C & LM Plan is the best tool the state has to decarbonize the building sector by incentivizing electrification efforts. It can drive the market towards electrification, but not as currently drafted. Continuing gas incentives locks in decades more emissions and postpones the building electrification needed to address the climate crisis and meet Connecticut’s climate goals. We urge the Commissioner to end gas incentives in the 2022 - 2024 C & LM Plan.
Click to set custom HTML

Housatonic Wild & Scenic Designation 

Submitted 09-22-2021
Park: Northeast Regional Office
Project:Housatonic River CT Proposed Wild and Scenic River Designation
Document: Housatonic River Wild and Scenic River Evaluation 2021

The Connecticut League of Conservation Voters is pleased to to join with our colleagues including the Housatonic Valley Association (HVA), the Housatonic River Commission (HRC), and other conservation, economic, and civic partners, including the CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and Governor Lamont, in support of congressional designation of the Housatonic as a Partnership Wild and Scenic River from the MA/CT border to the Boardman Bridge in New Milford.
This segment of Housatonic River qualifies for congressional designation as a Partnership Wild and Scenic River with the local support, local administrative Comments: structure, locally adopted river management plan and demonstrated local commitment to river protection that is necessary for this designation.
We work on behalf of the environmental community across the state and recognize the national significance of our outstanding rivers here in Connecticut. This designation would provide national acknowledgement of the Housatonic River's outstandingly remarkable values and supports the platform for cooperative decision- making amongst stakeholders at the local, state and federal level to best protect the ecological, historic, cultural and recreational attributes of the river and region.

100% ZERO-CARBON

Submitted 03-03-2021
To: ​Honorable Co-Chairs Sen. Needleman and Rep. Arconti, and Distinguished Members of the Energy and Technology Committee
From:​ Lori Brown, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, thank you for the opportunity to provide comments in regards to ​SB 882 An Act Concerning Climate Change Mitigation and Home Energy Affordability​.

100% Zero Carbon

CTLCV strongly supports SB 882 to codify into statute Executive Order #3, proposed by Governor Lamont in 2019, to bring Connecticut to a 100% zero-carbon electric grid by 2040.

Unfortunately, this bill only requires that electricity “supplied to electric customers in the state” meet the 100% zero-carbon goal, not all electricity generated in Connecticut. ​The language in SB 882 must be amended to include electricity generation along with supply. By only addressing the electricity supplied to customers, Connecticut could still theoretically achieve the 100% goal by 2040 while still having 54 fossil fuel power plants in the state. That number could be even higher if the Killingly power plant progresses.

This bill is not consistent with our state’s goals of achieving a carbon-free electric grid. ​SB 882 as written is an unacceptable retreat from the original intent of the Governor’s Executive Order #3 that CTLCV supported in 2019.

A true clean-energy future does not include 54 polluting power plants. Connecticut should not allow itself to become a hub of dirty electricity in New England when we have come so far in our environmental goals.

In 2019, Connecticut passed legislation to procure as much as 2,000 megawatts in clean offshore wind energy. However, new fracked gas power plants, like the 650 megawatt plant in Killingly and the 375 megawatt plant in Middletown, are reversing Connecticut’s progress on climate change. According to the Acadia Center’s June 2020 Brief on the Role of Natural Gas Power in New England, over the next decade, gas will play a much smaller role in electricity generation. As a result, new and existing gas-fueled power plants will be underused and unnecessary.

Energy Efficiency

CTLCV applauds the provision in SB 882 that allows DEEP to procure​ 300,000 megawatts of electricity from demand response and energy efficiency measures,​ which is equivalent to 1% of Connecticut’s entire load. These resources are proven to not only save customers money, but also to provide stability and reliability for the electric grid at all hours of the day as the state increases the use of resources such as wind and solar energy.

Home Energy Rating

CTLCV supports SB 882 to ​ensure that homeowners have affordable energy solutions at their disposal that do not contribute to further environmental degradation​. Energy affordability begins with transparency of costs for homeowners and renters as well as the opportunity to reduce those costs. Property owners, when listing homes, will be required to provide prospective buyers and tenants with either a Home Energy Label - a number generated during a home energy audit that summarizes the property’s energy efficiency - ​or​ the last twelve months of energy bills. Doing so will inform prospective buyers of the upfront costs, which works toward ensuring energy affordability for all.
​
On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, I urge you to ​AMEND SB 882 to include electricity ​generation​ along with supply, ​and to support energy efficiency procurement and home energy affordability. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. 

TAKE ACTION

AIR QUALITY

Submitted 03-04-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Gresko, Vice Chairs Sen. Slap and Rep. Palm, Ranking Members Sen. Miner and Rep. Harding, Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, CT League of Conservation Voters

Thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of HB 6551, An Act Concerning Environmental Air Quality. This legislation would establish an environmental equity working group composed of members from communities of color, low-income communities and communities bearing disproportionate pollution and climate change burdens. This working group, in conjunction with the Department of Public Health, the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and the Labor Department will develop criteria to identify disadvantaged communities for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and co-pollutants in those communities.

Although Connecticut is a nationwide leader in the fight against climate change, the state has not done enough to address environmental inequities. Low-income and communities of color in Hartford, Waterbury, New Haven, Stamford, and Bridgeport are disproportionately affected by climate change, pollution, and other environmental threats. HB 6551 would help prevent further environmental harm to these communities due poor air quality and other environmental degradation.

According to the American Lung Association’s “State of the Air 2019,” Connecticut ranked 10th as the worst polluted with smog and given “F ratings” for ozone air pollution levels. When inhaled, ozone damages the lungs and compromises the ability of the body to fight respiratory infections. Asthma, for instance, is the single most avoidable cause of hospitalization, and yet Connecticut incurred $102 million acute care charges due to asthma in 2018. Residents from Bridgeport, Hartford, New Haven, Stamford, and Waterbury account for 18% of Connecticut’s total population but account for 44% of the $102 million of those asthma acute care charges.

HB 6551 works in conjunction with Connecticut’s environmental justice law to prevent further “affecting facilities” (power plants, sewage treatment plants, waste incinerators, and landfills) from being placed near low-income and minority communities. Just this week the Connecticut General Assembly passed HB 6514 to incentivize construction of new, highly polluting data centers to be built in Connecticut.

​Because data centers are one of the most energy-intensive building types, it is critical that this bill mitigate the energy and emissions impacts. Connecticut must do this to address climate change and meet out state's greenhouse gas reduction mandate under the Global Warming Solutions Act. The environmental justice and energy concerns include:
  • ​Added pollution burden on environmental justice communities. There are concerns that 25-50 megawatt diesel generators are desired by the industry, and would add to the pollution burden of environmental justice communities. According to the Integrated Resources Plan, environmental justice communities bear the disproportionate burden of air pollution from fossil power plants in Connecticut. Twenty-three of the state’s large fossil fuel generating units are located in environmental justice communities, emitting more than 372 tons of NOx annually, and causing unhealthy levels of air pollution.
  • Data centers are one of the most energy-intensive building types, consuming 10 to 50​ times the energy per floor space of a typical commercial office building. Collectively, these spaces account for approximately 2% of the total U.S. electricity use, and as our country's use of information technology grows, data center and server energy use is expected to grow too. As we’re trying to reach a 100% clean energy goal in the state, it is critical that data centers meet standards that will mitigate energy use.
  • All large data servers use water, both directly and indirectly, and the amounts can be very substantial.
​
To mitigate these concerns, we urge you to amend the bill to:
  • Prohibit diesel or fossil fuel back-up power to protect environmental justice communities.
  • Require the most energy-efficient servers
  • Require that construction of data centers meet a net-zero, all-electric standard
  • Require that data centers conserve water by requiring air cooled or closed loop water systems
  • Require buildings be heated with waste heat from the data center, and allow excess heat to be used for thermal energy storage and or community heating needs
  • Require data centers to meet sustainability goals of the municipality in which they are located.

CTLCV urges the committee to SUPPORT HB 6551 to ensure that Connecticut receives clean, non-polluting energy that protects the public health of our most vulnerable populations, as well as meaningful reduction of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions. Thank you for considering these recommendations to strengthen this legislation.

Lori Brown
Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

BLUE PLAN

Submitted 02-09-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Borer and Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
​From: Lori Brown, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of HJ 53, a Resolution Proposing the Adoption of the Long Island Sound Blue Plan. 

Long Island Sound is the Northeast’s largest estuary and includes some of the Earth’s most productive natural habitats. The Sound is important to more than 20 million people who live within 50 miles and generates billions annually for local economies through tourism, fishing and other uses.

Without the Long Island Sound Blue Plan, the state has no authority to adequately plan for multiple future uses of the Sound, whether they be recreational, industrial, or developmental. The Blue Plan incorporates the contributions of nearly 2,000 individuals from conservation, business, recreation, government, Native American tribes and the public. Additionally, with investments in offshore wind rapidly increasing throughout the region Connecticut needs to be able to plan for transmission of clean energy. It is imperative that the committee pass the Long Island Sound Blue Plan to proactively protect Long Island Sound while preserving traditional uses, maritime beauty, and environmental values.

Sincerely,
​
Lori Brown
Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

CLASS III RENEWABLES

Submitted 03-03-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Needleman and Rep. Arconti and Distinguished Members of the Energy & Technology Committee
​From: Megan Macomber, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN OPPOSITION of HB 6527, An Act Increasing the Total Output of Class III Sources.

As Connecticut works towards achieving a 100% zero-carbon electric grid by 2040, increasing the output of anything but Class I Renewables works against our state’s clean energy goals. There are no incentives or value to be obtained by Class III renewables. Increasing the output of these sources undermines CT’s zero carbon energy work and delays our progress in mitigating climate change.

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, I urge you to OPPOSE HB 6527 and ensure CT is working efficiently toward achieving its energy goals. Thank you for your consideration of these comments.
​
CT League of Conservation Voters 

TAKE ACTION

CLEAN AIR ACT 

Submitted 02-18-2021
To: Honored Chair Rep. Lemar, Vice Chairs Sen. Cassano and Rep. Simms, Ranking Members Sen. Somers and Rep. Carney, and Distinguished Members of the Transportation Committee.
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters
​
On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of HB 5419, An Act Concerning The Federal Clean Air Act Fee on Motor Vehicle Registrations.  This bill will ensure that revenues collected for clean air, greenhouse gas reduction and other environmental purposes are used as intended on clean transportation initiatives.

Transportation pollution accounts for 38% of total greenhouse gas emissions in our state, hurting our air and water quality, and our public health. To slow our climate crisis, Connecticut needs to take important steps to invest in clean transportation and clean energy. HB 5419 aims to clean and improve our transportation system.

The revenue generated from the Clean Air Act Fee can be invested in bus system improvements, vehicle electrification, biking and walking paths and more. Connecticut has lofty electric vehicle goals and this bill can will help us achieve those targets.

HB 5419 is a logical and much needed step in the right direction for Connecticut’s fight against climate change. CTLCV urges the committee to support HB 5419. Thank you for your consideration as you deliberate this bill.
​
Sincerely,

​Lori Brown
Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

COMPOSTING

03-17-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Gresko, and Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee 
From: Megan Macomber, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters 

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, thank you for the opportunity to  submit testimony in support (with adjustments) of SB 930 to address expanding commercial composting in our state. 

Connecticut is currently facing a severe waste crisis - outdated landfills are closing down, MIRA is scheduled to close, and our state will be resorting to the costly and environmentally damaging choice of shipping our trash to other states for disposal. 

Food waste accounts for 20% of the 2.5 million tons of solid waste our state generates every year, while regional landfill capacity will shrink 40% in the next 5 years.
An expansive composting program could divert 520,000 tons of food waste from our waste stream every year.  

Our waste management goals require the diversion and/or recycling of at least 60% of the solid waste generated in the state by 2024. In order to reach these goals and advance the Comprehensive Materials Management Strategy, we would like to see this bill go further to create more efficient food waste diversion.
The Commercial Organics Ban, Public Act 11-217, should be amended in order to strengthen its effectiveness. Please consider adding these provisions to the existing language:

  1. ELIMINATE EXEMPTIONS: The current law exempts some of the biggest generators of food waste such as universities, hospitals, food courts and stadiums. Any commercial entity that generates the established amount of food waste should have to divert it to a composting facility.
  2. LOWER  QUALIFYING WEIGHT TO ½ TON PER WEEK:  In 2020, the organics ban was expanded to apply to entities generating more than one ton of food waste per week. The qualifying weight should be further decreased to ½ ton per week or 26 tons per year by 2023.
  3. REMOVE THE GEOGRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS: The current law only applies to non-exempt food waste generators within 20 miles of a composting facility.  We understand that waste transportation is expensive and hope to see more composting facilities in years to come. Rather than make geographic requirements, Connecticut should allow businesses to apply for an exemption if they are too far away from a composting facility. ​
  4. COMPLIANCE STAFF AND PENALTIES:  There are no penalties for non-compliance, making the current law unenforceable. Furthermore, DEEP only has the resources to staff one part time position responsible for compliance.  Funding must be set aside for DEEP to hire more compliance technicians who can issue fines for violations of the food diversion policy.

We at CTLCV are encouraged to see this bill under consideration as a critical part of Connecticut’s waste management infrastructure, and we urge the committee to go further in updating the 2020 Commercial Organics Ban.   

TAKE ACTION

ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Submitted 03-01-2021
To: ​Honored Chairs Sen. Needleman and Rep. Arconti and Distinguished Members of the Energy & Technology Committee
​From: ​Lori Brown, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony ​IN SUPPORT of SB 127, An Act Concerning The Sale of Electric Vehicles in The State. ​​

Most electric vehicle (EV) drivers “charge where they park,” with approximately 90% of EV charging taking place at home and work. ​The remaining 10% occurs at a variety of commercial locations. In order to ensure access to electric vehicles across all income levels, residents need to have the ability to charge at their home. Without home charging capabilities, the percentage of EV-owners decreases.

Electric, zero-emission vehicles reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 75% compared to traditional gasoline engines, and are necessary to combat climate change and improve public health. Pollution from traditional fossil fuel vehicles has rapidly increased asthma and other respiratory diseases in our children and elderly. ​Electrifying our vehicles and expanding access to electric vehicle charging stations will improve air quality and reduce health impacts.

Increasing access to charging stations to renters and condo associations ensures that electric vehicles can be widespread across the state. ​SB 127 would give ​equitable access ​to charging stations to homeowners and renters alike.

We at CTLCV urge the committee to ​SUPPORT SB 127 ​to ensure equitable access to electric vehicle charging across the state​. ​Thank you for your consideration as you deliberate on this bill.
​
Sincerely,
Lori Brown Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

EMISSION STANDARDS

Submitted 03-02-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Borer and Distinguished Members of the  Environment Committee 
From: Emily Alexander, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters 

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of SB 931, An Act Concerning Emissions Standards for Medium and Heavy Duty Vehicles and to evaluate the need to adopt California’s medium and heavy-duty vehicle standards.

Medium and heavy-duty vehicles, like trucks and buses, cause poor air quality in some of our most overburdened neighborhoods. A Union for Concerned Scientists study showed that Asian American, Black, and Latino communities are disproportionately harmed by air pollution from vehicles. Respectively, they face 34%, 24%, and 23% more exposure than white communities.

Additionally, the toxic air pollutants emitted by these trucks have major health impacts, including asthma attacks, lung cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and premature death. According to the Sierra Club, although trucks account for only 10% of vehicles on the road, they are responsible for nearly 30% of carbon emissions, 45% of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, and 57% of particulate matter (PM2.5) emitted by the entire transportation sector. Toxic air pollutants have major health impacts, including asthma attacks, lung cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and premature death.

In 2020, California adopted the Advanced Clean Truck (ACT) rule requiring manufacturers to produce zero-emission trucks beginning in 2024, and it increases production targets through 2035. Additionally, the rule aims to put 300,000 zero-emission trucks on the road by 2035. It requires that sales of medium and heavy-duty vehicles reach at least 30% by 2030, 40% by 2035, and 100% by 2045. Also in 2020, Connecticut joined 15 other states in signing a memorandum of understanding on their commitment to truck electrification and eliminating toxic air pollution from medium and heavy-duty trucks and buses by 2050. 

Connecticut needs to adopt the California medium and heavy-duty vehicle standards to keep us on track to achieving our clean air goals, protecting public health, and slowing climate change-related issues. We urge the committee to SUPPORT SB 931. Thank you for your consideration as you deliberate on this bill. 
​
Sincerely,
Emily Alexander
Climate Policy Advocate

TAKE ACTION

ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Submitted 03-03-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Lopes and Rep. McGee and Distinguished Members of the Housing Committee
From: Emily Alexander, Climate Policy Advocate, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of SB 356, An Act Establishing Energy Efficiency Retrofit Grant Program for Affordable Housing. 

As the state looks forward to achieving the stated goal of 100% zero-carbon electricity by 2040, we must make improvements in our most polluting sectors such as the Buildings sector. An energy efficiency retrofit program has many benefits including bringing equity to the forefront, public health, climate change mitigation, and economic development.

The retrofit program laid out in SB 356 would prioritize environmental justice and distressed communities. These communities are most at risk for air pollution causing lung and heart diseases, and often struggle with utility bills. SB 356 helps to bridge the equity gap that exists between high and low-income communities by allowing savings on utility bills and addressing public health concerns. These same communities often suffer the impacts of dirty fossil fuel plants and polluting facilities. It’s time we invested in them instead of hurting them further.

Retrofitting residential units is cost-saving, both immediate and long-term. It provides immediate energy savings to residents and pays for itself in better health for occupants. Immediate retrofitting saves energy, helping us to meet the climate change goal of reducing energy use.

Retrofitting provides good, local jobs, contributing to the state’s economy. According to a 2020 study by the Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction, 2016 energy efficiency programs supported 34,000 clean energy jobs in Connecticut. Investments in the energy efficiency workforce bring the highest return on investment of any green job.

CTLCV strongly supports this proposal to reduce greenhouse gases emissions and ensure energy equity in affordable housing. We urge the committee to vote YES on SB 356 

Sincerely, 
Emily Alexander

TAKE ACTION

ENERGY EFFICIENCY

Submitted 02-17-2021
To: Honored Co-Chairs Sen. Needleman and Rep. Arconti, and Distinguished Members of the Energy & Technology Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters
 
On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of SB 863, An Act Concerning Energy Efficiency Standards, to expand energy and water efficiency standards.
 
SB 863 makes it easy to choose the right appliances to save water, energy, and money. Efficiency is the simplest way to save energy and end reliance on polluting fossil fuels. The more efficient the appliance, the less energy used, and the more money saved.
 
The standards proposed in SB 863 will provide utility bill savings for consumers and businesses, while also protecting customers from energy waste. According to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), these new standards could save enough electricity to power 13,000 homes in Connecticut by 2026, save 2.1 billion gallons of water equivalent to the consumption of 62,000 homes, and by 2035 the savings from these standards will grow to $169 million annually. 
 
SB 863 is a logical and much needed step in the right direction for Connecticut residents to make informed decisions on appliances that will help them lower their energy and water consumption and save money. 
CTLCV urges the committee to SUPPORT SB 863 to expand energy and water efficiency standards. Thank you for your consideration as you deliberate on this bill.
Sincerely,

Lori Brown
Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY

Submitted 02-09-2021
To: Honored Co-Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Borer and Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

Thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony in support of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR). CTLCV strongly supports HB 6386, An Act Concerning Extended Producer Responsibility for Tires, Smoke Detectors, and Certain Gas Cylinders, with changes that bring the tire language into an EPR framework. A tire hauler license would not curb illegal tire dumping, it would not fix the disposal problem, and it would be expensive for the taxpayer.

Connecticut has been at the forefront of supporting and implementing EPR and has brought diverse stakeholders together to develop programs for electronics, mattresses, paint, and thermostats. These programs have saved municipalities millions of dollars in disposal costs, created jobs, and developed more effective disposal programs for these items.

Packaging changes and single use items have increased the amount of trash due to limited recycling options. By involving producers in product disposal, EPR incentivizes the redesign of products with the cost of disposal in mind. EPR is a mandatory policy requiring manufacturers to take responsibility for their product and packaging through all life cycle stages, including disposal.

CTLCV is thrilled that lawmakers are turning to EPR as an important waste management tool and we thank you for your consideration of our remarks.
​
Sincerely,
​
Lori Brown
Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

DEEP FUNDING

Submitted 03-08-2021
To: Honored Co-Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Gresko, Vice Chairs Sen. Slap and Rep. Palm, Ranking Members Sen. Miner and Rep, Harding, Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of CTLCV, thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony on SB 924 to ensure that DEEP is properly funded, staffed, and equipped with adequate resources to protect our environment and public health.

CTLCV is encouraged to see a bill that addresses the resources of DEEP. There has never been a more important time for this agency to be well supported and fully capable of responding to climate change. We need more baseline data and more ability to monitor changes--good and bad--whether they be contamination, increased flooding, droughts, or wildlife die off. We need DEEP programs and staff to respond to adverse changes and to promote resiliency.

This is the time to reverse the recent trend of removing resources from DEEP. CTLCV hopes that the purpose of the report called for in SB 924 is to identify where additional funding and support is most needed, and the means of providing it.

It has been well documented that programs on the regulatory side of DEEP monitoring the quality of our public trust resources in air, soil, and water have been understaffed and are in need of programmatic improvements. For example, an improvement of this type is the work currently being done to update the Transfer Act. Far more resources and staff are needed for performance assessments and enforcement of this and other programs.
​
Well run regulatory programs protect resources and are a net cost savings to the state. DEEP has critical responsibilities of enforcing environmental laws that protect the quality of our land, water, wildlife, air and climate, and its resources should be a top priority for the legislature. Thank you. 

TAKE ACTION

HOUSING

Submitted 03-03-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Lopes and Rep. McGee and Distinguished Members of the Housing Committee
From: Emily Alexander, Climate Policy Advocate, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters
 
On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of SB 356 to establish an energy efficiency retrofit grant program for affordable housing.
 
As the state looks forward to achieving the stated goal of 100% zero-carbon electricity by 2040, we must make improvements in our most polluting sectors such as the Buildings sector. An energy efficiency retrofit program has many benefits including bringing equity to the forefront, public health, climate change mitigation, and economic development.
 
The retrofit program laid out in SB 356 would prioritize environmental justice and  distressed communities. These communities are most at risk for air pollution causing lung and heart diseases, and often struggle with utility bills. SB 356 helps to bridge the equity gap that exists between high and low-income communities by allowing savings on utility bills and addressing public health concerns. These same communities often suffer the impacts of dirty fossil fuel plants and polluting facilities. It’s time we invested in them instead of hurting them further.
​
Retrofitting residential units is cost-saving, both immediate and long-term. It provides immediate energy savings to residents and pays for itself in better health for occupants. Immediate retrofitting saves energy, helping us to meet the climate change goal of reducing energy use.

Retrofitting provides good, local jobs, contributing to the state’s economy.  According to a 2020 study by the Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction,  2016 energy efficiency programs supported 34,000 clean energy jobs in Connecticut. Investments in the energy efficiency workforce bring the highest return on investment of any green job - $1 million or 18 job years.

CTLCV strongly supports this proposal to reduce greenhouse gases emissions and ensure energy equity in affordable housing. We urge the committee to vote YES on SB 356.

TAKE ACTION

KILLINGLY PIPELINE

Submitted 01-06-2021
To: Alexander Ericson, CT DEEP, Bureau of Water Protection and Land Reuse
From: Emily Alexander, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

Dear Mr. Ericson:

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the tentative decision by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) on Application No. 202001005-WQC by Eversource Energy to discharge industrial wastewater associated with steam electric power generation operations located at 189 Lake Rd, Killingly, CT. We appreciate your consideration of some of the concerns we have with this tentative decision.
 
We urge the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) to reject this application in the final decision process. The last thing Connecticut needs is more costly pollution. This power plant will not only cause filthy air pollution, but also irreparable water pollution. The dirty wastewater from this plant is likely to contain oil and heavy metals which would be treated at the Killingly water treatment plant and then discharged into the Quinebaug River. Despite being treated, the wastewater going into the river will still contain harmful pollutants. Protecting Connecticut’s water should come before an unnecessary power plant.
 
This power plant is not only unnecessary but costly to our residents. We have made considerable commitments to clean energy and emissions reduction, but approval of this plant goes directly against Governor Lamont’s Executive Order 3 to ensure a zero-carbon electric grid by 2040. It will increase our continued reliance on fossil fuels and is out of alignment with Connecticut’s Global Warming Solutions Act goals. Investing in gas infrastructure when we already have renewable energy options in the pipeline will hurt our environment and our residents, and will hold Connecticut back from real solutions to climate change and resiliency. 

Furthermore, this application does not address perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAs). These chemicals must be monitored in the wastewater being generated by this power plant. PFA’s are bioaccumulative, toxic to people and animals, and cannot be broken down. Wastewater will be generated from a number of sources including cleaning equipment and drains. In the future, the Town of Killingly Water Pollution Control Facility may be required to treat these chemicals; and DEEP’s permitting process should require PFAs monitoring to ensure that treatment for them does not fall solely on the rate payers and local tax revenue.

CTLCV strongly opposes this application and hopes that DEEP will reject it in the final decision. Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments on this important issue.
​
Sincerely,
 
Emily Alexander
Climate Policy Advocate

TAKE ACTION

LAND USE APPEALS

Submitted 03-02-2021
To: Honorable Committee Co-Chairs Sen. Winfield and Rep. Stafstrom, Vice-Chairs Sen. Kasser and Rep. Blumenthal, Ranking Members Sen. Kissel and Rep. Fishbein and Members of the Judiciary Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, CT League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the CT League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony in strong opposition to SB 938, An Act Concerning Land Use Appeals.

This legislation is a repeat attempt to undermine our state’s bedrock environmental law, THE CT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT (CEPA).
​
It is common practice for developers to sue towns that reject permits for proposals that would unreasonably damage the environment. Often, the towns do not have the financial resources to match the developer’s legal challenge, and the town is forced to settle.

This bill would permit parties who are appealing land use decisions to withdraw their appeals prior to a hearing in Superior Court. Current law requires that a hearing be held before withdrawal (likely due to a settlement). SB 938 removes the opportunity for a public hearing unless the defendant in the appeal (i.e., the land use agency) objects to the withdrawal.

While the bill appears on its face to streamline the judicial process, this hurts potential intervenors, and especially CEPA intervenors, by depriving them of the opportunity to be heard on land use cases. Developers will have the opportunity to strike deals with planning and zoning bodies while cutting out potential intervenors and without establishing a public record.

CEPA Intervenors can also provide important information to the parties that can help inform a negotiated settlement and minimize the project’s environmental damage. The purpose of this bill is to reduce public input for the sole benefit of the developer. The single hearing which is currently mandated is necessary to hold land use authorities accountable and is an important tool for environmental groups to participate as parties advocating on behalf of the environment.

We urge you to oppose any legislation that seeks to bypass our core environmental protection laws and vote to REJECT SB 938.Thank you for considering these comments as you deliberate this legislation.

Sincerely,
​
Lori Brown
Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

MDC

Submitted 03-04-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Cassano and Rep. McCarthy-Vahey, Ranking Members Sen. Hwang. and Rep. Zullo, Distinguished Members of the Planning & Development Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, Executive Director, CT League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony regarding SB 966, An Act Concerning The Metropolitan District of Hartford County, to require an annual financial audit and establish a task force to examine the operations of the MDC. This quasi, public-private authority has long been at the center of controversy due to its lack of accountability and for policy decisions that are not in the best interest of the public it was created to serve.

CTLCV has been working to bring reforms to the MDC since the 2017 revelation regarding the Authority’s hidden deals to sell our public municipal water supply to an out of state water bottling company at a huge discount while raising rates for residential customers who were conserving water. MDC’s disregard for the public’s opposition to this use of a public trust resource led to legislation creating the position of MDC Public Advocate. A good step, but not a solution to the structural problems that have resulted in a failed business model.

There must be a serious effort to review the finances, operations, and ethical standards by which the MDC must abide. The legislature created the MDC and can make course corrections for the by statute if the Authority is unable to perform in the best interest of the public. We support the following:

*Require annual audits of the Metropolitan District's books and accounts

The MDC’s business model is based on the need to sell ever larger quantities of water to remain solvent and maintain their water infrastructure. According to the MDC Public Advocate, this is a “conservation death spiral.” MDC has been unable to find savings or alternatives to this unsustainable model, so a new “set of eyes” independent of the MDC is needed.

*Establish a task force to examine the organization and operations

MDC’s charter is out of date and must be revisited by an independent task force whose appointed members are not current or past commissioners of the MDC. As written, the task force could wind up dominated by the same appointees that currently serve on the MDC’s board.

The task force should also review how MDC commissioners are appointed, the criteria used, and whether this needs to be more transparent and accountable. The Charter should thoroughly define the roles and responsibilities of a Commissioner and who they represent.

*Require the MDC Board of Commissioners to adopt, administer and enforce the model code of ethics

The public trust in the MDC has been severely eroded by their own actions and lack of any accountability to the public. They were created with the same powers of a municipality (such as issuing bonds), but not required to have the same code of ethics. It is important to restore the public trust by ensuring full compliance with an established code of ethics, such as the CCM model.
​
We at CTLCV urge the committee to consider this legislation as significant for the well-being of our state’s water resources, and not just a “Hartford” issue as the bill title suggests. How the largest water system in the state manages this public resource impacts the entire state’s ability to handle droughts, allocate water fairly, design rates that encourage conservation, prepare for climate change and protect our rivers, streams and wetland habitats. 

TAKE ACTION

MUNICIPAL FUNDING OPTION

Submitted 03-05-2021
To: Honored Co-Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Gresko, Vice Chairs Sen. Slap and Rep. Palm, Ranking Members Sen. Miner and Rep. Harding, Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of CTLCV, thank you for the opportunity to comment in support of HB 6441, An Act Concerning Climate Change Adaption. This legislation is a unique opportunity to provide new tools to our towns and cities to fight climate change.

Section 3 of the bill will give municipalities an option to establish a buyer’s conveyance fee to fund land stewardship, climate resilience, and other environmental projects in our communities. Towns across the state could use these funds to support local projects such as conserving open space, combatting invasive species in lakes, testing for brownfield remediation, stewardship of urban parks, creating woodland trails, matching state and federally funded grants, and many other environmental projects.

Adoption of the program by towns is optional, and at no expense to Connecticut.

Municipalities can choose what is best for them and their residents.

This would not impact the municipal mill rate or require further local bonding.

Many towns have voiced their desire to have a local conveyance fee option to help their conservation efforts. This is not just a one-time infusion of money to purchase land—this is a long-term sustainable funding stream that will help our land, water and climate for generations.

CTLCV urges you to support HB 6441 and give municipalities the freedom to choose the financial tools that are best suited to their local environmental needs. Passage of this bill will ultimately benefit our entire state. Thank you.

TAKE ACTION

PESTICIDES TRACKING

Submitted 02-09-2021
To: Honored Co-Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Borer and Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of CTLCV, thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of SB 839, An Act Concerning Electronic Documents and Pesticide Regulation in The State.
​
The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) currently uses an outdated paper filing system for applicator certifications, which makes it impossible to get real-time updates and access to accurate information about pesticide use in our state.

It is increasingly acknowledged that pesticides and chemicals pose significant health threats to humans and wildlife. Yet, they are poorly monitored or regulated as the types and classes of these toxic chemical continue to increase. To protect public health, we need to ensure complete, easily accessible documentation of these toxic chemicals.

According to a 2017 report by the CT Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), enforcement and inspections for pesticide use in our state have fallen to a 15-year low. This is unacceptable. We must drastically reform our pesticide tracking system and ensure that DEEP has the resources to maintain it.

In 2019, HB 5999 An Act Concerning Pesticide Regulation was voted out of the Environment Committee as well as the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee without any adjustments. HB 5999 would have dedicated certain funds specifically for use by the pesticide program as well as establish a “Pesticide Enforcement Account” to support inspection and enforcement activities.

SB 839 should include the CEQ recommendations that failed to make it over the finish line in 2019: Establish a searchable electronic filing system and reinstate the environmental monitoring program. The legislation should also create a dedicated pesticide program fund. This could generate up to $3 million per year from pesticides registrations to fund increased staffing and inspections.

CTLCV urges the committee to SUPPORT SB 839. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Lori Brown
Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

PFAS

Submitted 03-19-2021
To: Honored Co-Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Gresko, Vice Chairs Sen. Slap and Rep. Palm, Ranking Members Sen. Miner and Rep, Harding, Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee

From: Lori Brown, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of CTLCV, thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of SB 926 to ban the sale of consumer products containing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

According to the Center for Disease Control, PFAS are strongly linked to testicular and kidney cancer, liver damage, hormone disruption, increases in cholesterol, thyroid disruption, asthma, reproductive disorders including infertility, low birth weight, and decreased response to vaccines. Despite these dangers, PFAS continues to be used in nonstick cookware, water-repellent clothing, stain resistant fabrics and carpets, some cosmetics, products that resist grease, water and oil, food packaging and food service ware.

There are more than 4,700 PFAS in use today, and their prevalence has caused pollution at 1,398 sites in 49 states, including Connecticut. PFAS have been found in the tap water of millions of homes across the United States. Furthermore, the United States Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry (ATSDR) found that PFAS were more harmful than previously thought and that supposed “safe levels” were 10 times less than previously thought.

PFAS are called “Forever Chemicals” because they do not break down easily and remain in the environment and the human body for years. PFAS can leak out of landfills or industrial sites, endangering entire populations. As PFAS build up in the environment, future generations risk exposure at higher levels than today.

It is time for Connecticut to stop contamination at the source and ban consumer products that contain these toxic chemicals.

Thank you for your consideration of these comments.

TAKE ACTION

PFAS

Submitted 02-09-2021
To: Honored Co-Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Borer and Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
From: Lori Brown, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of CTLCV, thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of SB 837, An Act Concerning The Use of Perfluoroalkyl or Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Class B Firefighting Foam.

According to the Center for Disease Control, PFAS are strongly linked to testicular and kidney cancer, liver damage, hormone disruption, increases in cholesterol, thyroid disruption, asthma, reproductive disorders including infertility, low birth weight, and decreased response to vaccines. Despite these dangers, PFAS continues to be used in class B firefighting foam, nonstick cookware, water-repellent clothing, stain resistant fabrics and carpets, some cosmetics, products that resist grease, water and oil, food packaging and food service ware.

There are more than 4,700 PFAS in use today, and their prevalence has caused pollution at 1,398 sites in 49 states, including Connecticut. PFAS have been found in the tap water of millions of homes across the United States. Furthermore, the United States Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry (ATSDR) found that PFAS were more harmful than previously thought and that supposed “safe levels” were 10 times less than previously thought.

PFAS are called “Forever Chemicals” because they do not break down easily and remain in the environment and the human body for years. PFAS can leak out of landfills or industrial sites, endangering entire populations. As PFAS build up in the environment, future generations risk exposure at higher levels than today.

It is extremely difficult to effectively clean up spills or get it out of our water resources. It is time for Connecticut to stop contamination at the source and prohibit the use of PFAS in class B firefighting foam and in consumer products that contain these toxic chemicals.

Thank you for your consideration of these comments.

Sincerely,
Lori Brown
Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

POLYSTYRENE & PLASTICS

Submitted 03-03-2021
To:​ Honored Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Borer and Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
​From:​ Megan Macomber, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony ​IN SUPPORT of HB 6502, An Act Concerning The Use of Polystyrene Products, The Availability of Single-Use Straws, The Release of Certain Balloons And The Compostable Nature of Single-Use Product Bags. ​This bill would phase out the use of certain polystyrene trays and food containers, prohibit the automatic distribution of single-use plastic straws at certain eating establishments, prohibit the intentional release of certain helium balloons and examine the compostable nature of certain single-use produce bags.
​
Polystyrene products and single-use plastics are rarely biodegradable and can remain in the environment years after they are discarded by the consumer. These products are not recyclable so they go to landfills or incinerators where they further contribute to Connecticut’s poor air quality.

It is critical that this bill not conflict with any town bans on polystyrene across CT. Any statewide ban must not preempt municipalities from passing or implementing policies regarding polystyrene that are stricter than what the State prescribes. Statewide measures should provide a baseline of environmental protection, not a ceiling.

Polystyrene, balloons and single use plastic bags all pose serious threats to marine ecosystems and wildlife. Birds and aquatic animals can ingest these materials, eventually leading to poisoning or starvation. These products can also breakdown into microplastics and accumulate in environments where they can eventually be ingested by humans.

CTLCV would like to emphasize that ​bags labeled ‘compostable’ are often only able to breakdown properly in the extreme environments of anaerobic digestion​. It is critical that a study of compostable bags include whether these products break down completely in normal compost and aquatic environments.

We at CTLCV urge the committee to ​SUPPORT HB 6502 ​and phase out polystyrene products, single use straws, balloon releases and carefully study the compostable nature of certain single use bags. Thank you for considering these comments.

Sincerely,
Megan Macomber
​Operations Manager

TAKE ACTION

SOLID WASTE

Submitted 03-18-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Gresko and Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
From: Megan Macomber, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony IN SUPPORT of SB 1037 to address modernizing Connecticut’s container deposit law (known as the Bottle Bill).

The Bottle Bill law provides incentive for consumers to recycle their beverage containers, thereby reducing litter throughout the state and keeping recyclable bottle containers out of landfills and incinerators. Despite inflation and increased redemption facility costs, the Bottle Bill has not been updated since its original drafting in 1978. The 3.5 cent handling fee has forced many redemption centers to close their doors, and the once attractive 5 cent deposit is no longer a sufficient incentive for many consumers.
In 1978 the beverage market was a fraction of what it is now.  Beverages like coffee, tea, sports drinks and juices are excluded from our container deposit law. According to the Container Recycling Institute (CRI), CT could capture 416 million more containers each year by expanding the accepted containers under the bottle deposit program.

SB 1037 has a performance target for wine and liquor recycling, which will have a significant role in diverting more containers from our waste stream. Connecticut municipalities pay to dispose of up to 16,000 tons of these non-deposit glass containers per year. Putting a deposit on more glass containers will help shrink our solid waste and prevent these broken bottles from contaminating our recycling stream.

Redemption centers across the state are struggling to keep their doors open. Increasing the handling fee to 3.5 cents will ensure these facilities can keep up with rising operation costs and continue to provide recycling services in Connecticut. An increased handling fee will also make opening a redemption center more attractive, and having more of these small businesses around the state will provide good green jobs to our residents and increase access to redeem the deposit.

Redemption centers are geographically scattered and infrequently sited in urban areas. A modernized bottle bill must include public education on the increased deposit, and how and where to return bottles and cans so that we do not inadvertently penalize our most vulnerable communities that may lack convenient redemption locations. Including Reverse Vending Machines (RVMs) in chain retailers across the state is an important step in ensuring that the bottle bill is modernized equitably.
 
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for modernization. Redemption centers remained open as mandatory business while grocery stores shut down their bottle return rooms, making it nearly impossible for residents claim their deposits. The increase in bottle sales paired with the decrease in returns caused CT’s redemption rate to fall below 45% in 2020, costing consumers $10 million in unclaimed deposits.

An expansion of the bottle redemption program is popular among CT voters. According to a poll conducted in January 2019 by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, 81% of voters in  Connecticut support expanding the state’s bottle deposit program to include all recyclable containers, including 64% of voters who strongly support the expansion.

CTLCV urges the committee to SUPPORT HB 1037 in order to keep vital recycling facilities operating, prevent litter, create good green jobs, and increase CT’s recycling rates to compete with the best performing states in the country.

CTLCV Briefing Papers on the Bottle Bill and on Glass Recycling can be found on our Website at https://www.ctlcv.org/2021-watchlist.html
​
Thank you for your consideration of our comments.

TAKE ACTION

TRANSPORTATION & CLIMATE INITIATIVE

Submitted 03-04-2021
To: ​Honored Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Borer and Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
From: ​Lori Brown, Executive Director,​ ​Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters, thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony ​IN SUPPORT of SB 884, An Act Reducing Transportation-related Carbon Emissions.

SB 884 codifies into statute the implementation of the program to cap and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transportation known as the Transportation and Climate Initiative Program TCI-P. TCI-P is essential to fighting climate change and ensuring cleaner air and better connectivity within the state. The program centers on input from low-income and other marginalized communities to better address equity issues.

Transportation accounts for 38% of Connecticut’s greenhouse gas emissions, making it a major contributor to our climate crisis.​ Transportation is also a public health and equity issue. Connecticut urban centers are overrun with traffic congestion, leading to some of the worst air quality in the country. In 2019, the ​American Lung Association​ “State of the Air” report gave the state of Connecticut “F ratings” for ozone air pollution levels.

The program institutes a binding declining cap on carbon emissions from gasoline and on-road diesel fuel, requiring fuel suppliers to purchase allowances to cover the emissions from the fossil fuel components of that fuel. ​Proceeds from allowance auctions are projected to generate as much as $89 million in the first year and $1 billion in the first ten years, providing Connecticut with the revenue needed to decarbonize and modernize the transportation sector.

Connecticut must reduce greenhouse emissions by 45% below 2001 levels by 2030 and 80% below 2001 levels by 2050 to comply with the Connecticut Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA) standards. The TCI-P would ensure at least a 26% reduction in carbon emissions from transportation from 2022 to 2032, helping the state to meet a significant portion of its greenhouse gas reduction goal.

Implementation of the TCI program is popular among state voters. According to DEEP,​ 81% of voters say it’s important for the state to reduce climate pollution and to increase clean, public transportation options.

Any transportation reform in Connecticut must focus on equity. ​The TCI-P plans to invest no less than 35% of annual proceeds to assist communities overburdened by pollution and underserved by the current transportation system.​ Moreover, TCI-P establishes Equity Advisory Boards in Signatory Jurisdictions tasked with assessing the equity impacts of the program on an ongoing basis, notably by monitoring air quality in low-income and communities of color disproportionately affected by transportation pollution.

TCI-P envisions a solution that meets climate goals while providing net benefit to the economy, public health, and state infrastructure. CTLCV urges the committee to ​SUPPORT SB 844​ in order to ensure better quality air and transportation for all Connecticut residents, as well as meaningful reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Thank you for your consideration as you deliberate on this bill.

Lori Brown
​Executive Director

TAKE ACTION

VEGETATION MANAGEMENT

Submitted 03-03-2021
To: Honored Chairs Sen. Needleman and Rep. Arconti, Ranking Members Sen.Formica and Rep. Ferraro, Distinguished Members of the Energy & Technology Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, CT League of Conservation Voters
​
On behalf of the League, thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony in opposition to Senate Bill 950, An Act Concerning The Replacement of Public Utility Poles and Revising Vegetation Management in Utility Protection Zones. This would allow utilities to destroy perfectly healthy trees and habitat with ZERO accountability or notification to affected parties. Handing this expanded power to the utilities would be an egregious lapse in responsible stewardship of our environment.

This policy reversal is under consideration at a time in our history when protecting healthy tree cover and sustainable forest management are increasingly seen as essential to mitigating climate change.

Protecting healthy trees is the simplest and the least expensive way to help heal our climate. This committee has rightly focused on building infrastructure to produce clean energy but should also recognize that there is a natural vegetative infrastructure in place now that can help achieve our climate goals—if it is not destroyed. This proposal flies in the face of recommendations recently released by the Governor’s Council on Climate Change, which recognize trees as essential in curbing the damage from carbon emissions.

Eversource’s legacy of destruction can be seen across our state, with half butchered trees lining our streets and enormous clearcuts along our highways. This is what Eversource considers proper vegetation management.

Bill 950 would give utilities free reign over town-owned street trees in the Utility Protection Zones, take away authority of local tree wardens, and eliminate the notification, consent, and appeal rights of the people, including private property owners.

This legislation would allow electric utilities to take immediate action on trees without first obtaining the tree warden’s consent or consultation, and then potentially leaving the environmental damage for the town and tree warden to address.

The electric utilities are deaf to the concerns of our citizens regarding their reckless handling of our public trust resources. Their effort to reverse the checks and balances that PURA restored to our state’s management of its trees should be summarily rejected. Thank you for consideration of our testimony. 

TAKE ACTION

VOTING RIGHTS

Submitted 02-19-2021
HJ 58 RESOLUTION PROPOSING A STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO ALLOW NO-EXCUSE ABSENTEE VOTING.
​
HJ 59 RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO ALLOW FOR EARLY VOTING.

To: Honored Committee Co-Chairs Sen. Flexer and Rep. Fox, Ranking Members Sen. Sampson and Rep. Mastrofrancesco and Members of the GAE Committee
From: Lori Brown, Executive Director, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony on critical voting rights legislation. As an environmental organization dedicated to empowering voters on behalf of the environment, we know that more people voting will more accurately reflect the public’s concerns about air and water quality, natural resource protection and climate change impacts.

Democracy, equity, and the environment are intertwined.

The public expects a clean, healthy and safe environment no matter where they live. The easier it is for people to vote, the more people will be engaged in our democratic process, which can only strengthen support for the environment.

For a lot of young people today—citizens from all ethnic and social backgrounds and income levels—climate change and environmental justice are key concerns that motivate them to get involved and to vote in federal, state, and local elections. Connecticut should be encouraging and helping these new voters by expanding all available options to cast their vote. Voter suppression should have no place in our state.

Accessibility is key to democracy.

CTLCV’s work depends on voter engagement. Our support for pro-environment candidates includes removing any unnecessary obstacles to voting for them at election time. Everyone should have a say in what is happening to our planet and voting can be the most direct way to ensure the public’s voice is heard from all segments of society.

The environment has become a key voting issue. In all our discussion with people running for elected office, we have seen that both candidates and voters have become increasingly more knowledgeable about environmental concerns, especially climate change. This was made more evident when our new President was elected on the most ambitions climate change platform in US history. Who we elect directly affects our environment.

The legislation before you to allow No Excuse Absentee Voting and Early Voting is long overdue and the public demands action. These two bills must not be derailed by the same voices that deny our climate is in crisis, or that our state’s bedrock environmental laws should be weakened.

In addition to making it easier to vote, strengthening our democracy requires that winning candidates better reflect the will of the people. We urge the committee to take up HB 5884 which simply calls for a study of Ranked Choice Voting, a tested solution to ensure that the successful candidate will have majority support of the electorate.

Please use this opportunity to vote for legislation that will help Democracy, equity, and the environment. Thank you for considering these comments as you deliberate voting rights legislation.

Lori Brown, Executive Director 

TAKE ACTION

WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING

Submitted 03-03-2021
To:​ Honored Co-Chairs Sen. Cohen and Rep. Borer, and Distinguished Members of the Environment Committee
From:​ Megan Macomber, Connecticut League of Conservation Voters

On behalf of the Connecticut League of Conservation Voters (CTLCV), thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony ​IN SUPPORT of SB 925, An Act Prohibiting The Import, Sale and Possession of African Elephants, Lions, Leopards, Black Rhinoceros, White Rhinoceros and Giraffes.

Poaching has decimated many populations of Africa’s endangered species. ​These animals are​ ​critical to maintaining the ecological biodiversity of their regions, ​but their survival is being threatened by climate change, loss of habitat, and high rates of poaching and hunting.

While poaching is now illegal in many African countries, Westerners still indulge in trophy hunting missions to kill endangered species and take home trophy hides. These hunters defend false claims that the money they spend goes towards local conservation efforts, but a 2013 study by ​Economists at Large​ found that ​only 3% of trophy hunting revenue is used for conservation related activities.

The majority of lions killed for sport can be attributed to American tourists. ​From 2005-2020, Connecticut residents killed 71 leopards, 39 lions and one giraffe, ​then proceeded to import their trophies. Additional permits were obtained by Connecticut residents to hunt and kill African elephants in Botswana, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe. Not only does this result in abuse of these animals, but it has also contributed to instability and economic dependency in many of these regions. ​Illegal poaching remains a major source of funding for criminal organizations and terrorist groups.

The threats to the big 6 have only increased in past years. In 2018 the U.S. lifted the ban on importing some elephant and lion trophies. ​Poaching rates then soared in 2020 because the pandemic prevented travel for wildlife watching which normally deters poachers. ​It is critical that states lead the way to ban the importation, sale and possession of these animals. ​Animals listed as threatened and endangered can still be trophy hunted with permits. ​By banning the import of these body parts, CT eliminates its market for endangered wildlife trophies, and joins 9 other states​ i​ n passing laws to restrict or ban the sale of endangered animal products. Our state must step up and do its part to help protect delicate ecosystems, thwart illegal poachers and cut off funding to terrorist and criminal groups.

We at CTLCV urge the committee to​ SUPPORT SB 925​, and pass a statewide ban on the import, sale and possession of the “Big Six African species”. Thank you for your consideration as you deliberate on this bill.

Sincerely, 
​Megan Macomber

TAKE ACTION

View testimony on past legislation.
CTLCV protects our environment by working with elected leaders to preserve a safe and healthy environment for the public good. | Privacy Policy
© 2008-2021 Connecticut League of Conservation Voters 553 Farmington Avenue, Suite 201, Hartford, CT 06105 | 860.236.5442 | ctlcv@ctlcv.org